spacer.png, 0 kB
Home arrow Help Center arrow Helpful Links and Information arrow Protecting Victims of Domestic Violence
Protecting Victims of Domestic Violence | Print |  E-mail
A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER’S GUIDE TO ENFORCING ORDERS OF PROTECTION NATIONWIDE

WHAT IS FULL FAITH AND CREDIT?
  
In 1994, Congress enacted the full faith and credit provisions of the Violence Against Women (VAWA) {18 U.S.C.§ 2265-66}. The federal law directs jurisdictions to give full faith and credit to valid orders of protection issued by other jurisdictions.  This includes all 50 states, Indian tribal lands, the District of Columbia, the US Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, American Samoa, the Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam.  The full faith and credit provisions were amended in October 2000.


Simply stated, full faith and credit requires that:

Valid orders of protection must be enforced to protect victims wherever a violation of an order occurs, regardless of where the order was issued.
  
What does this mean for the victims?
Abused persons who are granted court orders of protection can call upon law enforcement to protect them and to take all appropriate action against abusers nationwide.
  
What does this mean for abusers?
The abuser is bound by the terms and conditions of the order of protection and may be arrested and charged with violating the order and committing other substantive crimes wherever the abuser violates a valid order.  It  does not make any difference where the order was granted.  The abuser must be arrested for a violation of an order of protection if the law of the jurisdiction where the violation occurred requires an arrest.
  
What does this mean for law enforcement?
If an order of protection is valid in the issuing jurisdiction, it must be enforced in every other jurisdiction, it must be enforced in every other jurisdiction whether or not it is registered.  Some jurisdictions grant orders:
  • To victims who might not be eligible for orders in the enforcing jurisdiction
  • For periods of time longer than authorized in the enforcing jurisdiction
  • Containing directives against abusers that might not be available in the enforcing jurisdiction
A responding officer must enforce the terms and conditions of a valid  order as written, including custody provisions and firearm prohibitions.  Officers are not required to know the laws of an issuing jurisdiction in order  to enforce orders of protection.  Officers in the enforcing jurisdiction  must comply with all laws, policies and procedures of their own jurisdiction concerning violation of orders of protection, such as mandatory arrest  and victim notification, if applicable.
  
WHY IS FULL FAITH AND CREDIT IMPORTANT?      
When victims of domestic violence leave, they and their children are at an increased risk of violence.  Abusers who cross jurisdictions in pursuit of victims may be engaged in stalking, which is a significant risk indicator of life-threatening violence.
  
Liability for Failure to Enforce Orders of Protection
The mandate to give full faith and credit to orders of protection nationwide confronts law enforcement with new challenges, including the possibility  of liability for failure to enforce orders of protection from other jurisdictions.  Many jurisdictions have laws that provide officers with statutory immunity from civil liability when an officer takes reasonable action to protect  a victim in a domestic violence case.
Failure to enforce an order of protection because it was issued in another jurisdiction may leave officers and departments vulnerable to liability.
  
Reducing the Risk of Liability:
  
  • Understand the laws of your jurisdiction related to liability
  • Respond in a timely fashion
  • Investigate thoroughly
  • Follow arrest laws of enforcing jurisdiction
  • Enforce custody provisions
  • Offer assistance and referral to victim
  • Complete detailed incident reports
  • Charge appropriately
  • Follow-up for victim protection
  • Train all law enforcement personnel
  • Supervise carefully to ensure victim safety
  • Confiscate proscribed weapons
 Full Faith and Credit for Orders for Protection
  
Issuing jurisdiction determines:
  • Whether an order of protection should be issued
  • Who is to be protected
  • Terms and conditions of the order
  • Duration of the order
Enforcing jurisdiction determines:
  • How the order is enforced
  • Arrest authority of responding officer
  • Detention and notification procedures
  • Crimes charged for violation of an order
WHAT IS AN ORDER OF PROTECTION?
  
Under VAWA, a protection order is defined as:
Any injunction or other order issued for the purpose of preventing violent or threatening acts or harassment against, or contact or communication with, or physical proximity to, another person.
  
The Federal full faith and credit provision of VAWA applies to both criminal  and civil orders of protection.  Orders may differ in form, content,  length, layout, and names  (i.e., stay away, restraining, criminal,  and emergency or temporary protection orders, or injunctions.)
  
In some jurisdictions, a certification form is affixed to the order of  protection verifying that it is a valid order of the court.  However,  under federal law, a certification form is not required for the order  of protection to be enforced.  Nor is there any requirement that  the order or the signature of the issuing authority be original or that  there being a raised seal or stamp of the court on the document.  Additionally,  federal law prohibits jurisdictions from making victims register or file  their orders of protection with police, the courts, or a state/national  registry before the order can be enforced.
  
Basic Elements of a Valid Order of Protection
Any court order of protection should be presumed valid if all of the  following are found:
  • The order gives the names of the parties
  • The order contains the date the order was issued, which is prior to the  date when enforcement is sought
  • If the order has an expiration date, the date of expiration in the order  has not occurred
  • The order contains the name of the issuing court
  • The order signed by or on behalf of a judicial officer
  • The order specifies terms and conditions against the abuser
Verifying the Terms and Conditions of an Order of Protection
Verification is not required under Federal law and may be necessary only if the order does not appear valid on its face.  In some cases,  the enforcing jurisdiction’s law may require verification if the protected party cannot furnish a copy of the order.
  
Verification can be accomplished by any one of the following methods:
  • Confirm the elements of an order in NCIC Protection Order File
  • Review the elements of an order in state or local registries of protection orders in the issuing jurisdiction
  • Confirm the elements by communication with the issuing court
  • Review the elements of an order if previously filed with designated authorities  in the enforcing jurisdiction
  • Draw upon personal knowledge of the offer or information obtained through  an interview
Determining the Terms and Conditions of an Order of Protection
  
After providing for victim and Officer safety, it is essential that the  officer read the order in its entirety.  An order may state something  one paragraph and specify exceptions in another.  For example, an  order may state that the abuser is to have “no contact” with  a victim in one paragraph and then, in another, state that contact may  occur to arrange for visitation with the children. In this case, if the  abuser contacted the victim for any reason other than to arrange for  visitation, the order was violated.
  
Evaluating the Enforceability of an Order of Protection
  
An order of protection issued in another jurisdiction is enforceable when:
  • The order appears to be valid
  • There is probable cause to believe that a violation of the order occurred  in the enforcing jurisdiction
Ex Parte Orders
  
Ex parte Orders are emergency or temporary orders issued prior to providing the respondent with notice or a hearing.  Ex parte orders are entitled to full faith and credit if the respondent has notice of the order and will have an opportunity to be heard in court within the time required by state or tribal law, and in any event within a reasonable time after  the order is issued, sufficient to protect the respondent’s due process rights.  This is true even if the respondent has not yet had an opportunity to be heard in court.
  
Where enforcement requirements have not been met, the officer in the  enforcing jurisdiction may not be able to arrest specifically for a violation  of the order.  However, other potentially chargeable offenses may  have occurred, such as trespassing.  The officer should make a warrantless  arrest or seek an arrest warrant related to the criminal conduct based  on the enforcing jurisdiction’s law.
   
Mutual Orders of Protection
  
Sometimes an order of protection will contain a “no contact” provision against both parties or it will direct both parties not to abuse each other.  The full faith and credit section of VAWA requires special safeguards for inter-jurisdictional enforcement of this type of order.  Basically it states that an order should be enforced against the respondent (person against whom the order was issued) and not the petitioner unless the  respondent filed a written pleading and the issuing court made a specific finding that each party was entitled to such an order.  If such findings were made, the order may be enforced against both parties. 
  
WHAT ENFORCEMNT ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN?
  
 Immediate Action
  • Ensure the safety of all involved
  • Seek medical attention, if necessary
  • Safeguard the victim from further abuse
  • Secure and protect the crime scene
  • Seek voluntary surrender of firearms for safekeeping purposes
  • Seize firearms subject to state, territorial, local, or tribal prohibitions
  • Enforce custody provisions in accordance with jurisdictional law and the language of the order
  • Identify whether an order of protection has been violated
  • Evaluate the validity and enforceability of the order
  • Arrest for violation of the order where required by the enforcing jurisdiction
  • Arrest for any other criminal offenses
  • Seek an arrest warrant, when required, related to the criminal conduct if the abuser is not at the scene
  • Attempt to locate and arrest the abuser
Firearms
  
Federal law prohibits an abuser subject to a qualifying* order of protection form possessing firearms and ammunition. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8).  When an officer determines that a valid order of protection has been issued against an abuser, the officer should enforce the prohibition.  Seizing weapons subject to this prohibition, if allowed under state law, is essential to victim and community safety.  Officers also should be knowledgeable about their own jurisdiction’s law authorizing or precluding possession or transfer of weapons to third parties by a person subject to an order of protection.
  
*The issue of “qualifying” orders of protection is a standard  necessary under federal law to enforce federal firearms provisions; however,  it is not required for according full faith and credit.  For further details, see 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(8).
  
HELPFUL INTERVENTIONS
  
Referral Actions
  • Address transportation and housing needs of victim by making appropriate  referrals to community services
  • Refer victim to the appropriate court or victim advocacy agency to obtain assistance in enforcing the economic provisions of an order, such as child support enforcement
Safety Strategies
  • Notify victim of legal rights within enforcing jurisdiction
  • Assess lethality
  • Conduct safety planning with the victim
  • When a child has been abducted in violation of an order of protection,  seek return of the child and when necessary seek an Unlawful Flight to Avoid Prosecution (UFAP) Warrant (see page 12)
  • Provide telephone numbers for local shelters and hotlines
  • Follow up with law enforcement and victim advocacy programs
Assessing Lethality
  
Factors to consider in determining serious injury/lethality potential:
  • Threats of homicide/suicide
  • History of domestic violence and violent criminal conduct
  • Separation of parties
  • Stalking, including cross-jurisdictional travel to threaten or harass
  • Depression or their mental illness
  • Obsessive attachment to victim
  • Drug or alcohol involvement
  • Possession or access to weapons
  • Abuse of pets
  • Destruction of victim’s property
  • Access to victim and victim’s family and other supporters
Please Note: These factors, which are not listed in any particular order of importance, can be helpful in many cases, but are not guaranteed predicators of future violence.
                   
 “Providing the victim with referral information at the scene of a domestic incident can be the most important action an officer can take to stop domestic violence.”
  
 Bill Berger, IACP
 President
  
SUMMARY OF FEDERAL CRIMES OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
  
Officers must be familiar with Federal laws that pertain to domestic  violence in order to assess whether Federal crimes have been committed.
  
For the following Federal crimes, the law defines State to include: a  state of the United States, the District of Columbia, a commonwealth,  territory, or possession of the United States.
  
Interstate Travel to Commit Domestic Violence-18 U.S.C.§2261
  
It is a Federal crime for a person to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or leave or enter Indian country with the intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate a spouse or intimate partner when in the course of or as a result of such travel, the person commits or attempts to commit  a violent crime against that spouse or intimate partner.  The person must intend to commit domestic violence at the time of travel.  The broad definition of spouse or intimate partner includes a spouse or former  spouse of the abuser, a person who shares a child in common with the  abuser, a person who any other person similarly situated to a spouse who is protected by the domestic or family violence laws of the state or tribal jurisdiction in which the injury occurred or where the victim resides.
  
It is also a Federal crime to cause spouse or intimate partner to travel  in interstate or foreign commerce, or leave or enter Indian country, by force, coercion, duress, or fraud, if in the course of, as a result of, or to facilitate such conduct or travel, the person commits or attempts  to commit a crime of violence against the spouse or intimate partner.
  
Interstate Stalking-18 U.S.C. §2261A
  
It is a Federal crime to travel in interstate or foreign commerce or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or leave or enter Indian country, with the intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate any person if, in the course of or as a result of such travel, the offender places that person in reasonable fear of  the death of, or serious bodily injury to, that person, a member of that person’s immediate family, or that person’s spouse or intimate  partner.  The terms immediate family and spouse or intimate partner are broad and include a spouse or former spouse of the stalking target, a person who share a child in common with the staking target, a person who cohabits or has cohabited as a spouse with the stalking target, any other person similarly situated to a spouse who is protected by the domestic or family violence laws of the state or tribal jurisdiction in which  the injury occurred or the victim resides, and a parent, child, sibling, and all household members related to the stalking target by blood or marriage.
  
It is also a Federal crime to use the mail or any facility of interstate or foreign commerce (including telephones, fax machines, and the Internet)  to engage in a course of conduct that places a person in reasonable fear  of the death of, or serious bodily injury to, that person, a member of  that person’s immediate family, or that person’s spouse or intimate partner.  The offender must commit theses acts with the  intent either to kill or injure a person in another state or tribal jurisdiction  or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States or to place a person in another state or tribal jurisdiction or  within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United  States in reasonable fear of the death of, or serous bodily injury to,  that person, a member of that person’s immediate family, or that  person’s spouse or intimate partner.  A course of conduct is defined as a pattern composed of two or more acts evidencing a continuity  of purpose.
  
Interstate Violation of an Order of Protection-18 U.S.C. § 2262
  
It is a Federal crime to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or leave or enter Indian Country, with the Intent to engage in conduct that  violates the portion of a protection order that prohibits or provides protection against violence, threats, or harassment against, contact  or communication with, or physical proximity to, another person, or that  would violate such a portion of a protection order in the jurisdiction  in which the order was issued.  The person must intend to violate the order at the time of travel and must subsequently engage in a violation of such portion of the order.
  
It is also a Federal crime to cause another person to travel in interstate  or foreign commerce, or leave or enter Indian country, by force, coercion, duress, or fraud, if in the course of, as a result of, or to facilitate such conduct or travel the offender engages in conduct that violates the portion of a protection order that prohibits or provides protection  against violence, threats, or harassment against, contact or communication with, or physical proximity to, another person, or that would violate  such a portion of a protection order in the jurisdiction in which the order was issued.
  
Unlawful Flight to Avoid Prosecution (UFAP) Warrant
  
‘UFAP’ stands for ‘Unlawful Flight to Avoid Prosecution,’ a  Federal crime under 18 U.S.C. 1073.  In the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act of 1980.  Congress made clear its intent that these  provisions apply to cases involving parental kidnapping. When state and  local law enforcement official desire Federal assistance in locating  parents who illegally fled their jurisdiction with a child, they would  first secure a state or local warrant for the individual’s arrest, and then request that the FBI obtain a UFAP warrant and assist in the  location and return of the individual.  The state or local prosecutor  may have to bear the cost of extradition if the state charge is extraditable.  If a state or local felony warrant cannot be used, the 18 U.S.C. 1204 is an alternative procedure to follow.
  
QUESTIONS FREQUENTLY ASKED ABOUT FULL FAITH AND CREDIT
  
What types of orders are accorded full faith and credit under federal law?
  • Both criminal and civil orders regardless of what the order is titled
  • Orders issued by courts with personal jurisdiction over the parties and  subject matter jurisdiction over the case
  • The law may encompass ex parte, Tribal, and consent orders
What if the victim does not have a copy of the order of protection?
  • Seek to verify the existence of an order
  • Verify victim’s claim of an order of protection through abuser’s  statement that an order of protection exists
  • Confirm through abuser’s statement that an order of protection exists
  • Determine whether there is probable cause to believe that the abuser has committed a criminal offense
  • Arrest abuser if appropriate under enforcing jurisdiction’s law  and notify issuing authority of arrest
  • Refer victim to appropriate court or advocacy agency
What if the abuser claims no notice or service of the order of protection?
  • Verify the existence of an order
  • Give notice to abuser of terms of the order of protection and provide  abuser with a copy
  • Explain consequences of future violations to the abuser
  • Notify issuing authority that the abuser received notice and/or a copy  of the order of protection
  • Notify issuing authority of arrest, if applicable
“As law enforcement officers, you play a critical role in ensuring that  protection orders are enforced and that victims who cross jurisdictional lines---whether to go to work, visit friends and relatives, or seek safe  haven---are safe.”
  
 Diane M. Stuart
 Director
 Office on Violence Against Women
  
What if the abuser has violated the order of protection and then fled  the scene?
  • Determine if abuser’s actions warrant arrest
  • Follow departmental procedure for dealing with a criminal suspect who  has fled the scene
  • Conduct safety planning and refer victim to appropriate court or advocacy  agency
What if the order of protection gives relief not authorized in officer’s jurisdiction?
  • Enforce terms and conditions of the order of protection as written
  • Enforce for duration specified in the order of protection
  • Enforce on behalf of victim(s) named in the order of protection
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE ON FULL FAITH AND CREDIT IMPLEMENTATION
Technical assistance is available to law enforcement and victims of domestic violence to answer specific questions and to facilitate effective enforcement.

Assistance to Victims of Domestic Violence
National Domestic Violence Hotline
(800) 799-SAFE (7233)
 TTY (800) 787-3224
(24 hours/day, for referral  to state and local programs)
  
Technical Assistance on Full Faith and Credit:

International Association of Chief of Police
(800) The-IACP
National Center on Full Faith and Credit
(800) 256-5883
Battered Women’s Justice Project
(800) 903-0111, ext. 2
  
Expertise on Tribal Legal Issues:

Sacred Circle (877) 733-7623
Mending the Sacred Hoop (888) 305-1650
American Indian Law Center (505) 277-5462
Northern Plains Tribal Judicial Institute (701) 777-6176
  
Expertise on Child Custody:

National Center on Full Faith and Credit (800) 256-5883
National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (755) 784-6012
< Previous   Next >
spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB
spacer.png, 0 kB
  spacer.png, 0 kB
Copyright © 2005, Pinellas County Domestic Violence Task Force. All rights reserved.
Site design by logodynamo.com